検索結果
-
モダリスの将来性をchatGPTに聞いてみた モダリス(Modalis Therapeutics)は、CRISPR技術を基盤とした遺伝子治療の開発に特化している日本のバイオテクノロジー企業です。その将来性については、以下のようなポイントが挙げられます。 1. **CRISPR-GNDM技術**: モダリスは独自の非編集CRISPR技術(CRISPR-GNDM)を使用しており、特に遺伝性疾患の治療に焦点を当てています。この技術は、遺伝子を切断することなく機能を修正するものであり、安全性と有効性の両面で高い評価を受けています [oai_citation:1,Modalis Therapeutics - Official Site](https://www.modalistx.com/en/)。 2. **パイプラインと臨床試験**: モダリスは現在、複数の治療候補を臨床開発段階に持っています。例えば、筋ジストロフィーやアルツハイマー病など、重大な医療ニーズに応える治療法を開発中です。これらの治療法が市場に出ることで、遺伝性疾患の治療に大きな進展が期待されています [oai_citation:2,Modalis (Biotechnology) Company Profile 2024: Stock Performance & Earnings | PitchBook](https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/223458-94)。 3. **市場と成長予測**: バイオテクノロジー業界全体が成長を続けており、特にCRISPRベースの治療法は将来的に大きな市場を形成すると予測されています。2024年には多くの遺伝子治療が承認される見込みであり、モダリスもこの波に乗ることが期待されます [oai_citation:3,What trends will shape the biotech industry in 2024?](https://www.labiotech.eu/in-depth/biotech-trends-2024/)。 モダリスの成功は、これらの技術的革新と市場動向に依存しています。今後の臨床試験の成功と規制当局からの承認が得られれば、同社は遺伝子治療のリーダーとして大きな成長を遂げるでしょう。
-
以下は、AT&Tホルダーには心強いニュースだと思います。 Will AT&T Increase Its Dividend This Year? https://finance.yahoo.com/news/t-increase-dividend-091500741.html 支出を上回る収入分(free cash flow)が増加し続けており、配当増加が許される状態にある。 AT&T can justify making a dividend increase AT&Tが配当を増やすのはは今年中ではないにしても時間の問題であり、利下げが始まったら同社の株価は上昇し始めるであろう。 stock will start rallying once interest rates come down AT&Tの株をその上昇が始まる前に買っておくことでより多くの見返りを手にすることができるだろう。 buying shares of AT&T before that happens could help you secure better returns AT&Tの財務はずっと良くなっており、長期投資にもってこいの事業体制になっている。 financials are in much better shape and the business should make for a solid long-term investment ちなみに私はMotley Foolの有料会員だったことがあるのですが、有料になると閲覧できる内容より無料の記事のほうがより中立的でより有益だと感じています。
★★Toyota's Six …
2024/06/11 08:25
★★Toyota's Six Cases of Cheating, Failing to Meet UN Standards...Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism: “High Possibility of Being Judged as Cheating in Europe as well”. 6/11 (Tue.) 5:04, Yomiuri Shimbun Online The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism (MLIT) has concluded that the six cases of fraud discovered at Toyota Motor Corporation violate not only national standards but also UN standards adopted by 62 countries and regions, including Japan, South Korea, and Europe. The standards for passenger cars in Japan and the UN are consistent, and it is highly likely that the same irregularities would prevent mass production in Europe and other regions as well. One week has passed since the announcement of the five companies' frauds. Based on the results of on-site inspections of the companies, MLIT will consider administrative penalties in accordance with the Road Trucking Vehicle Law. According to MLIT, by adopting the UN standards, a vehicle with a type designation in Japan can be certified in 61 countries and regions, including the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, and South Korea, without having to undergo similar testing. This is known as “mutual recognition,” and it has eased the burden on manufacturers that are expanding their operations overseas. The six tests in which Toyota was found to have committed fraud include: 1) occupant protection in the event of an offset (partial frontal) collision, 2) pedestrian head and leg protection, 3) rear-end collision, and 4) engine output. The details of the fraud were in violation of not only Japanese standards but also those of the UN. On the other hand, it was also found that the government concluded that some of the tests, which Toyota claimed were conducted under “stricter conditions than the national standards,” “cannot be said to be stricter in general. Toyota explained at a press conference on March 3 that it used data from a development test conducted at a 65-degree impact angle, rather than the 50-degree angle stipulated by the government, apologizing that it should have retested at 50 degrees and saying that 65 degrees was a more severe condition. However, according to a government official, whether or not the test is more stringent in terms of safety depends on the shape of the hood and other factors, and it is not possible to make a general decision based on the difference in angles. The government believes that some of the other tests claimed to be “stricter” are not all that strict and are likely to be judged as fraudulent in Europe and other countries as well. In connection with the fraud, manufacturers again called for “streamlining the system” from the viewpoint of international competitiveness and other factors. However, there is strong concern within MLIT that if domestic standards that differ from UN standards increase, mutual recognition will not be granted and overseas expansion will be affected. Five automakers, including Toyota, have stated that the 38 models that were found to be in violation of the standards “conform to the national standards and there is no problem with their continued use,” but MLIT will conduct its own tests. However, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism will conduct its own tests. The UN standards are international safety and environmental standards for automobile certification based on an agreement adopted by the United Nations, which was established through deliberations by regulatory authorities and industrial organizations in various countries. For passenger cars, there are 43 items, including brakes, speedometers, and noise, all of which Japan has adopted. Four items, including dimensions and weight, have no UN standards due to differences in road conditions and other factors, and are unique to Japan. Take care LMAO