Wani

"The instructors are the only ones who seem to care about the members. Managers and other staff don't seem to be aware of what's going on. When I asked them for help with fixing the problems related to online studio signup, they had no idea what to do. The basic functions of the platform are becoming less and less efficient. Other members have also reported that they keep getting kicked off their signup location on the studio class on the signup app. Furthermore, overcrowding from smaller clubs is now spilling over into the main club I go to, which is making things worse. I'm wondering how bad things will be after the merging of assets between the two companies at the end of March."

Nice copy and paste, this shows people know how the markets work. same people with many accounts posting as trolls.

Again, you are funny. because users know how bad this company is. It's not just me.....But many like me know how bad this sports club is who are members. Since if not most information on this site is Role-playing or employees and stockholders posting misinformation.

you make me laugh! Look at the Nikkei everything is up—even this worthless company. Pay attention to markets lately? Again, if you are not a member of this club or know anything about how their operations are maintained Nobody in their right mind would own this stock.

Look at the world markets they are up. All post new Year up ticks. Nothing more.

You are funny! Where do you see this? How can they do this based on the company its self-downsized? And the economy of Japan is different?

Have you considered that the decline in quality of these classes may be due to a lack of funding or resources for the instructors, rather than just their lack of effort or commitment? What about those who argue that the popularity of these classes and the high demand for them justifies the increase in fees and level of training? How would you address those who say that the transition to paid classes is inevitable and necessary for the sustainability of these programs?

seriously what is the matter? if you an adult wouldn't care. Yahoo says "Bulletin board "Everyone's rating" breaking Yahoo rules which you have seen, but you crying like a baby. One of those strange people who drives around those anti-Gaijin trucks that scream anti-Gaijin propaganda around cities in Japan. I am sorry but you keep changing your name and using multiple Yahoo accounts here. If you don't like it leave, and let everyone express your thoughts.

What about those who argue that the poor quality of service at the Renaissance sports clubs is a temporary issue that will improve in the future? Have you considered the possibility that other sports clubs may offer better service for a similar price point? Owning shares in a below-average company shouldn't be the only service offering preferential tickets. If the quality of the service equals that of the value of preferential tickets equal or below, you are not getting as much value for your investment.

Yahoo says "掲示板「みんなの評価」" 掲示板「みんなの評価」 mean everyone.
multiple accounts you post replies. This is a game for you. You have never been in a Renaissance sports club, never owned stocks, not Japanese. What problem? I am sorry but unless you are a member etc. nobody cares. don't like it? learn to expect others' opinions. back on the ignore list, you go troll

like you have good to say. who care what you say.

there is a big difference between large-scale sports clubs like Renaissance and this cheap anywhere with a box with space like Rizap. box clubs workout shops will not stay open if the usage doesn't justify the cost. Renaissance has full-time workers. unlike Rizap, which doesn't have contract workers. Neither of the two are good investments or short-term.

When it comes to these companies, Konami and Renaissance were two notable players. Konami had a reputation for being well-structured and supportive of its staff. On the other hand, Renaissance struggled with financial leaks and overspending.

Experts in the industry knew Konami was in a class of its own. They treated their staff fairly, including instructors, and sold off unprofitable land holdings. Renaissance, on the other hand, continued waste resources leak money for over a decade. By 2007, they could only offer short-term contracts with no benefits, took away staff locker rooms, and treated instructors differently than corporate employees, which negatively impacted talent retention.

Oasis trying to save Renaissance, but it was clear that the company was struggling. Comparing Konami and Renaissance is not helpful because they are too different. Instead, we should focus on Konami's strong business model fair treatment of employees as a positive example for the industry.

Because the same problems exist. There be no change until they change their current business model.

Wow, this board is new GOOD LUCK!

You need to go to the clubs to understand the flaws in the current structure. Maybe merging the assets of the two entities will bring change.

Hey there! I just wanted to offer some helpful advice about your recent joke. It's important to remember that investing can be unpredictable, and while it's great to have a sense of humor, it's also important to take a serious look at your investments. Don't be foolish and assume that a high point will last forever. It's important to stay informed and make informed decisions about your investments. Let me know if you want to chat more about it!

I completely understand why you feel discouraged. It's frustrating to see a decline in instruction quality and a focus on short-term gains over the well-being of its members. It's disheartening to see a once member-focused company prioritize profits over satisfaction. I hope that one day the company will realize that their true value lies in the happiness and satisfaction of its members and start prioritizing them again. Quality studio classes are crucial to retaining members in the long run.

Investors are excited about the possibility of increased stock value with Tokyu Sports Oasis' involvement, but it's crucial to acknowledge the potential risks. If the plan doesn't succeed, it could cause irreparable damage to the company. Even with institutional stock buying and other stabilizers, companies can still face unexpected challenges, as seen with the Renaissance group's disappointing performance and wasted capital over a 10-12 year period. It's imperative to learn from past mistakes and approach investment decisions with caution. While optimism is natural, being prepared for potential pitfalls is equally important.

I understand the concern about this site possibly being more geared toward role-playing than actual buying and selling. It's important to have factual information when making any transactions online. Yahoo has intended it to be this way.